Strategy / AIGIS resources

An independent AI governance layer keeps evidence separate from vendor AI strategy.

Vendor assistants can be useful. Independent governance answers a different question: who proves what the AI was allowed to know?

Executive read

The short version, before the deep dive.

Vendor assistants optimize for their own platforms.

Independent governance can focus on evidence and permission boundaries.

Model choice should remain separate from runtime trust.

AIGIS uses Salesforce as the first proof path for this category.

Analysis

What matters

The independence argument

An independent layer can evaluate the request before a vendor-specific assistant or model route becomes relevant.

That position helps security teams reason about permission evidence without tying the whole story to one vendor cloud.

The practical starting point

The practical start is not a grand multi-system claim. It is one governed Salesforce workflow that produces clear evidence.

Expansion should follow the evidence, with connector trust boundaries disclosed as they mature.

Resource packet

Turn this into a review worksheet.

Evidence packet

Permission-Provenance Evidence Packet

Capture user context, system of record, enforcement tier, stripped fields, model route, response, hash marker, and fallback notes.

Salesforce is the production proof path. ServiceNow and SAP are design-partner co-development paths with asymmetric enforcement that must be disclosed in diligence.

Get the packet