Architecture / AIGIS resources

What enterprise AI governance middleware has to do before an LLM sees data.

Enterprise AI governance cannot live only in policy documents. It has to sit in the execution path between users, systems of record, and the model.

Executive read

The short version, before the deep dive.

Governance must happen before prompt construction, not only after model output.

Record access must be live because record visibility can change minute by minute.

Field permissions can be cached for speed, but inaccessible fields should be stripped before the LLM receives context.

Every governed answer should carry provenance that explains which systems and permissions were involved.

Analysis

What matters

The governance layer belongs in the request path

If AI governance is only a review process, a spreadsheet, or a policy portal, it cannot stop a model from seeing data it should not see. Runtime governance has to intercept the request.

AIGIS sits between the user interface and the enterprise systems. It classifies intent, routes to systems, resolves identity, enforces permissions, strips fields, and only then constructs the LLM context.

Three tiers of permission enforcement

Object permissions answer whether the user can access a kind of record. Field permissions answer which attributes can be included. Record permissions answer whether this specific user can see this specific record right now.

AIGIS treats all three as required. If one tier fails or cannot be verified, the data does not enter the model context.

Why middleware beats vendor-by-vendor AI

Vendor-specific AI can feel simpler at first because it is already embedded in one application. The problem appears when every vendor sells a separate assistant with a separate bill, data boundary, model strategy, and audit trail.

Governance middleware gives the enterprise one enforcement path across systems, while preserving each system's native security model.